American journalist and writer (1880–1956)

Henry Louis Mencken (September 12, 1880 – January 29, 1956) was an American journalist, essayist, satirist, cultural critic, and scholar of American English.[1] He commented widely on the social scene, literature, music, prominent politicians, and contemporary movements. His satirical reporting on the Scopes Trial, which he dubbed the “Monkey Trial”, also gained him attention.

As a scholar, Mencken is known for The American Language, a multi-volume study of how the English language is spoken in the United States. As an admirer of the German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, he was an outspoken opponent of organized religion, theism, and representative democracy, the last of which he viewed as a system in which inferior men dominated their superiors.[2] Mencken was a supporter of scientific progress and was critical of osteopathy and chiropractic. He was also an open critic of economics.

Mencken opposed the American entry into World War I and World War II. Some of the opinions in his private diary entries have been described by some researchers as racist and anti-Semitic,[3] although this characterization has been disputed. Larry S. Gibson argued that Mencken’s views on race changed significantly between his early and later writings, and that it was more accurate to describe Mencken as elitist rather than racist.[4] He seemed to show a genuine enthusiasm for militarism but never in its American form. “War is a good thing”, he wrote, “because it is honest, it admits the central fact of human nature…. A nation too long at peace becomes a sort of gigantic old maid”.[5]

His longtime home in the Union Square neighborhood of West Baltimore was turned into a city museum, the H. L. Mencken House. His papers were distributed among various city and university libraries, with the largest collection held in the Mencken Room at the central branch of Baltimore’s Enoch Pratt Free Library.[6]

Early life[edit]

Mencken was born in Baltimore, Maryland, on September 12, 1880. He was the son of Anna Margaret (Abhau) and August Mencken Sr., a cigar factory owner. He was of German ancestry and spoke German in his childhood.[7] When Henry was three, his family moved into a new home at 1524 Hollins Street facing Union Square park in the Union Square neighborhood of old West Baltimore. Apart from five years of married life, Mencken was to live in that house for the rest of his life.[8]

In his bestselling memoir Happy Days, he described his childhood in Baltimore as “placid, secure, uneventful and happy”.[9]

When he was nine years old, he read Mark Twain‘s Huckleberry Finn, which he later described as “the most stupendous event in my life”.[10] He became determined to become a writer and read voraciously. In one winter while in high school he read William Makepeace Thackeray and then “proceeded backward to Addison, Steele, Pope, Swift, Johnson and the other magnificos of the Eighteenth century”. He read the entire canon of Shakespeare and became an ardent fan of Rudyard Kipling and Thomas Huxley. As a boy, Mencken also had practical interests, photography and chemistry in particular, and eventually had a home chemistry laboratory in which he performed experiments of his own design,
some of them inadvertently dangerous.[12]

He began his primary education in the mid-1880s at Professor Knapp’s School on the east side of Holliday Street between East Lexington and Fayette Streets, next to the Holliday Street Theatre and across from the newly constructed Baltimore City Hall. The site today is the War Memorial and City Hall Plaza laid out in 1926 in memory of World War I dead. At 15, in June 1896, he graduated as valedictorian from the Baltimore Polytechnic Institute, at the time a males-only mathematics, technical and science-oriented public high school.

He worked for three years in his father’s cigar factory. He disliked the work, especially the sales aspect of it, and resolved to leave, with or without his father’s blessing. In early 1898 he took a writing class at the Cosmopolitan University, a free correspondence school. This was to be the entirety of Mencken’s formal post-secondary education in journalism, or in any other subject. Upon his father’s death a few days after Christmas in the same year, the business passed to his uncle, and Mencken was free to pursue his career in journalism. He applied in February 1899 to the Morning Herald newspaper (which became the Baltimore Morning Herald in 1900) and was hired part-time, but still kept his position at the factory for a few months. In June he was hired as a full-time reporter.

Mencken served as a reporter at the Herald for six years. Less than two-and-a-half years after the Great Baltimore Fire, the paper was purchased in June 1906 by Charles H. Grasty, the owner and editor of The News since 1892, and competing owner and publisher Gen. Felix Agnus, of the town’s oldest (since 1773) and largest daily, The Baltimore American. They proceeded to divide the staff, assets and resources of The Herald between them. Mencken then moved to The Baltimore Sun, where he worked for Charles H. Grasty. He continued to contribute to The Sun, The Evening Sun (founded 1910) and The Sunday Sun full-time until 1948, when he stopped writing after suffering a stroke.

Mencken began writing the editorials and opinion pieces that made his name at The Sun. On the side, he wrote short stories, a novel, and even poetry, which he later revealed. In 1908, he became a literary critic for The Smart Set magazine, and in 1924 he and George Jean Nathan founded and edited The American Mercury, published by Alfred A. Knopf. It soon developed a national circulation and became highly influential on college campuses across America. In 1933, Mencken resigned as editor.

Personal life[edit]


In 1930, Mencken married Sara Haardt, a German-American professor of English at Goucher College in Baltimore and an author eighteen years his junior. Haardt had led an unsuccessful effort in Alabama to ratify the 19th Amendment.[14][15] The two met in 1923, after Mencken delivered a lecture at Goucher; a seven-year courtship ensued. The marriage made national headlines, and many were surprised that Mencken, who once called marriage “the end of hope” and who was well known for mocking relations between the sexes, had gone to the altar. “The Holy Spirit informed and inspired me”, Mencken said. “Like all other infidels, I am superstitious and always follow hunches: this one seemed to be a superb one.”[16] Even more startling, he was marrying an Alabama native, despite his having written scathing essays about the American South. Haardt was in poor health from tuberculosis throughout their marriage and died in 1935 of meningitis, leaving Mencken grief-stricken.[17] He had always championed her writing and, after her death, had a collection of her short stories published under the title Southern Album.

Great Depression, war, and afterward[edit]

During the Great Depression, Mencken did not support the New Deal, which cost him popularity, as did his strong reservations regarding U.S. participation in World War II, and his overt contempt for President Franklin D. Roosevelt. He ceased writing for The Baltimore Sun for several years, focusing on his memoirs and other projects as editor while he served as an adviser for the paper that had been his home for nearly his entire career. In 1948, he briefly returned to the political scene to cover the presidential election in which President Harry S. Truman faced Republican Thomas Dewey and Henry A. Wallace of the Progressive Party. His later work consisted of humorous, anecdotal, and nostalgic essays that were first published in The New Yorker and then collected in the books Happy Days, Newspaper Days, and Heathen Days.

Last years[edit]

On November 23, 1948, Mencken suffered a stroke, which left him aware and fully conscious but nearly unable to read or write and able to speak only with difficulty. After his stroke, Mencken enjoyed listening to classical music and, after some recovery of his ability to speak, talking with friends, but he sometimes referred to himself in the past tense, as if he were already dead. During the last year of his life, his friend and biographer William Manchester read to him daily.[18]


Mencken died in his sleep on January 29, 1956.[19] He was interred in Baltimore’s Loudon Park Cemetery.[20]

Though it does not appear on his tombstone, Mencken, during his Smart Set days, wrote a joking epitaph for himself:

If, after I depart this vale, you ever remember me and have thought to please my ghost, forgive some sinner and wink your eye at some homely girl.[21]

A very small, short, and private service was held, in accordance with Mencken’s wishes.[22]

Mencken was preoccupied with his legacy and kept his papers, letters, newspaper clippings, columns, and even grade school report cards. After his death, those materials were made available to scholars in stages in 1971, 1981, and 1991 and include hundreds of thousands of letters sent and received. The only omissions were strictly personal letters received from women.[citation needed]


In his capacity as editor, Mencken became close friends with the leading literary figures of his time, including Theodore Dreiser, F. Scott Fitzgerald, Joseph Hergesheimer, Anita Loos, Ben Hecht, Sinclair Lewis, James Branch Cabell, and Alfred Knopf, as well as a mentor to several young reporters, including Alistair Cooke. He also championed artists whose works he considered worthy. For example, he asserted that books such as Caught Short! A Saga of Wailing Wall Street (1929), by Eddie Cantor (ghostwritten by David Freedman) did more to pull America out of the Great Depression than all government measures combined. He also mentored John Fante. Thomas Hart Benton illustrated an edition of Mencken’s book Europe After 8:15.

Mencken also published many works under various pseudonyms, including Owen Hatteras, John H Brownell, William Drayham, WLD Bell, and Charles Angoff.[23] As a ghostwriter for the physician Leonard K. Hirshberg, he wrote a series of articles and, in 1910, most of a book about the care of babies.

Mencken admired the German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche (he was the first writer to provide a scholarly analysis in English of Nietzsche’s views and writings) and Joseph Conrad. His humor and satire owed much to Ambrose Bierce and Mark Twain. He did much to defend Dreiser despite freely admitting his faults, including stating forthrightly that Dreiser often wrote badly and was gullible. Mencken expressed his appreciation for William Graham Sumner in a 1941 collection of Sumner’s essays and regretted never having known Sumner personally. In contrast, Mencken was scathing in his criticism of the German philosopher Hans Vaihinger, whom Mencken described as “an extremely dull author” and whose famous book Philosophy of ‘As If’ he dismissed as an unimportant “foot-note to all existing systems”.[24]

Mencken recommended for publication philosopher and author Ayn Rand‘s first novel, We the Living and called it “a really excellent piece of work”. Shortly afterward, Rand addressed him in correspondence as “the greatest representative of a philosophy” to which she wanted to dedicate her life, “individualism” and later listed him as her favorite columnist.[25]

For Mencken, Adventures of Huckleberry Finn was the finest work of American literature. He particularly relished Mark Twain’s depiction of a succession of gullible and ignorant townspeople, “boobs”, as Mencken referred to them, who are repeatedly gulled by a pair of colorful con men: the deliberately pathetic “Duke” and “Dauphin“, with whom Huck and Jim travel down the Mississippi River. For Mencken, the depiction epitomizes the hilarious dark side of America, where democracy, as defined by Mencken, is “the worship of jackals by jackasses”.[26]

Such turns of phrase evoked the erudite cynicism and rapier sharpness of language displayed by Ambrose Bierce in his darkly-satiric The Devil’s Dictionary. A noted curmudgeon,[27] democratic in subjects attacked, Mencken savaged politics,[28] hypocrisy, and social convention. A master of English, he was given to bombast and once disdained the lowly hot dog bun’s descent into “the soggy rolls prevailing today, of ground acorns, plaster of Paris, flecks of bath sponge and atmospheric air all compact”.[29]

Defining Puritanism as “the haunting fear that someone, somewhere, may be happy”, Mencken believed that the U.S. had not cast aside the Puritans’ influence.[30] He opined that American culture, unlike its European counterparts, had not attained intellectual freedom, and judged literature by moral orthodoxy and not by artistic merit.[30] His most outspoken essay was “Puritanism as a Literary Force” from his 1917 collection of essays A Book of Prefaces:

The Puritan’s utter lack of aesthetic sense, his distrust of all romantic emotion, his unmatchable intolerance of opposition, his unbreakable belief in his own bleak and narrow views, his savage cruelty of attack, his lust for relentless and barbarous persecution – these things have put an almost unbearable burden up on the exchange of ideas in the United States.[31]

As a nationally-syndicated columnist and book author, he commented widely on the social scene, literature, music, prominent politicians and contemporary movements, such as the temperance movement. Mencken was a keen cheerleader of scientific progress but was skeptical of economic theories and strongly opposed to osteopathic/chiropractic medicine. He also debunked the idea of objective news reporting since “truth is a commodity that the masses of undifferentiated men cannot be induced to buy” and added a humorous description of how “Homo Boobus”, like “higher mammalia”, is moved by “whatever gratifies his prevailing yearnings”.[32]

As a frank admirer of Nietzsche, Mencken was a detractor of representative democracy, which he believed was a system in which inferior men dominated their superiors.[2] Like Nietzsche, he also lambasted religious belief and the very concept of God, as Mencken was an unflinching atheist, particularly Christian fundamentalism, Christian Science and creationism, and against the “Booboisie”, his word for the ignorant middle classes.[33][34][35] In the summer of 1925, he attended the famous Scopes “Monkey Trial” in Dayton, Tennessee, and wrote scathing columns for the Baltimore Sun (widely syndicated) and American Mercury mocking the anti-evolution fundamentalists (especially William Jennings Bryan). The play Inherit the Wind is a fictionalized version of the trial, and as noted above the cynical reporter E.K. Hornbeck is based on Mencken. In 1926, he deliberately had himself arrested for selling an issue of The American Mercury, which was banned in Boston by the Comstock laws.[36] Mencken heaped scorn not only on the public officials he disliked but also on the state of American elective politics itself.

In the summer of 1926, Mencken followed with great interest the Los Angeles grand jury inquiry into the famous Canadian-American evangelist Aimee Semple McPherson. She was accused of faking her reported kidnapping and the case attracted national attention. There was every expectation that Mencken would continue his previous pattern of anti-fundamentalist articles, this time with a searing critique of McPherson. Unexpectedly, he came to her defense by identifying various local religious and civic groups that were using the case as an opportunity to pursue their respective ideological agendas against the embattled Pentecostal minister.[37] He spent several weeks in Hollywood, California, and wrote many scathing and satirical columns on the movie industry and Southern California culture. After all charges had been dropped against McPherson, Mencken revisited the case in 1930 with a sarcastic and observant article. He wrote that since many of that town’s residents had acquired their ideas “of the true, the good and the beautiful” from the movies and newspapers, “Los Angeles will remember the testimony against her long after it forgets the testimony that cleared her”.[38]

In 1931, the Arkansas legislature passed a motion to pray for Mencken’s soul after he had called the state the “apex of moronia”.[39]

In the mid-1930s, Mencken feared Roosevelt and his New Deal liberalism as a powerful force. Mencken, says Charles A. Fecher, was “deeply conservative, resentful of change, looking back upon the ‘happy days’ of a bygone time, wanted no part of the world that the New Deal promised to bring in”.[40]

Race and elitism[edit]

In addition to his identification of races with castes, Mencken had views about the superior individual within communities. He believed that every community produced a few people of clear superiority. He considered groupings on a par with hierarchies, which led to a kind of natural elitism and natural aristocracy. “Superior” individuals, in Mencken’s view, were those wrongly oppressed and disdained by their own communities but nevertheless distinguished by their will and personal achievement, not by race or birth.

In 1989, per his instructions, Alfred A. Knopf published Mencken’s “secret diary” as The Diary of H. L. Mencken. According to an Associated Press story, Mencken’s views shocked even the “sympathetic scholar who edited it”, Charles A. Fecher of Baltimore.[3] A club in Baltimore, the Maryland Club, had one Jewish member. When that member died, Mencken said, “There is no other Jew in Baltimore who seems suitable.” The diary also quoted him as saying of blacks, in September 1943, that “it is impossible to talk anything resembling discretion or judgment to a colored woman. They are all essentially child-like, and even hard experience does not teach them anything”.

Mencken opposed lynching. For example, about a Maryland incident he said:

Not a single bigwig came forward in the emergency, though the whole town knew what was afoot. Any one of a score of such bigwigs might have halted the crime, if only by threatening to denounce its perpetrators, but none spoke. So Williams was duly hanged, burned and mutilated.[citation needed]

Mencken also wrote:

I admit freely enough that, by careful breeding, supervision of environment and education, extending over many generations, it might be possible to make an appreciable improvement in the stock of the American Negro, for example, but I must maintain that this enterprise would be a ridiculous waste of energy, for there is a high-caste white stock ready at hand, and it is inconceivable that the Negro stock, however carefully it might be nurtured, could ever even remotely approach it. The educated Negro of today is a failure, not because he meets insuperable difficulties in life, but because he is a Negro. He is, in brief, a low-caste man, to the manner born, and he will remain inert and inefficient until fifty generations of him have lived in civilization. And even then, the superior white race will be fifty generations ahead of him.[41]

In a review of The Skeptic: A Life of H. L. Mencken, by Terry Teachout, journalist Christopher Hitchens described Mencken as a German nationalist, “an antihumanist as much as an atheist”, who was “prone to the hyperbole and sensationalism he distrusted in others”. Hitchens also criticized Mencken for writing a scathing critique of Franklin Roosevelt but nothing equally negative of Adolf Hitler.[42]

Larry S. Gibson argued that Mencken’s views on race changed significantly between his early and later writings, attributing some of the changes in Mencken’s views to his personal experiences of being treated as an outsider due to his German heritage during World War I. Gibson speculated that much of Mencken’s language was intended to lure in readers by suggesting a shared negative view of other races, and then writing about their positive aspects. Describing Mencken as elitist rather than racist, he says Mencken ultimately believed that humans consisted of a small group of those of superior intelligence and a mass of inferior people, regardless of race.[4]


Mencken countered the arguments for Anglo-Saxon superiority prevalent in his time in a 1923 essay entitled “The Anglo-Saxon”, which argued that if there was such a thing as a pure “Anglo-Saxon” race, it was defined by its inferiority and cowardice: “The normal American of the ‘pure-blooded’ majority goes to rest every night with an uneasy feeling that there is a burglar under the bed and he gets up every morning with a sickening fear that his underwear has been stolen.”[43]


In the 1930 edition of Treatise on the Gods, Mencken wrote:

The Jews could be put down very plausibly as the most unpleasant race ever heard of. As commonly encountered, they lack many of the qualities that mark the civilized man: courage, dignity, incorruptibility, ease, confidence. They have vanity without pride, voluptuousness without taste, and learning without wisdom. Their fortitude, such as it is, is wasted upon puerile objects, and their charity is mainly a form of display.[44]

That passage was removed from subsequent editions at his express direction.[45]

Chaz Bufe, an admirer of Mencken, wrote that Mencken’s various anti-Semitic statements should be understood in the context that Mencken made bombastic and over-the-top denunciations of almost any national, religious, and ethnic group. That said, Bufe still wrote that some of Mencken’s statements were “odious”, such as his claim in his 1918 introduction to Nietzsche’s The Anti-Christ that “The case against the Jews is long and damning; it would justify ten thousand times as many pogroms as now go on in the world”.[46]

Author Gore Vidal later deflected claims of anti-Semitism against Mencken:

Far from being an anti-Semite, Mencken was one of the first journalists to denounce the persecution of the Jews in Germany at a time when The New York Times, say, was notoriously reticent. On November 27, 1938, Mencken writes (The Baltimore Sun), “It is to be hoped that the poor Jews now being robbed and mauled in Germany will not take too seriously the plans of various politicians to rescue them.” He then reviews the various schemes to rescue the Jews from the Nazis.[47]

As Germany gradually conquered Europe, Mencken attacked Roosevelt for refusing to admit Jewish refugees into the United States and called for their wholesale admission:

There is only one way to help the fugitives, and that is to find places for them in a country in which they can really live. Why shouldn’t the United States take in a couple hundred thousand of them, or even all of them?[47]


Democracy gives [the beatification of mediocrity] a certain appearance of objective and demonstrable truth. The mob man, functioning as citizen, gets a feeling that he is really important to the world—that he is genuinely running things. Out of his maudlin herding after rogues and mountebanks there comes to him a sense of vast and mysterious power—which is what makes archbishops, police sergeants, the grand goblins of the Ku Klux Klan and other such magnificoes happy. And out of it there comes, too, a conviction that he is somehow wise, that his views are taken seriously by his betters—which is what makes United States Senators, fortune tellers and Young Intellectuals happy. Finally, there comes out of it a glowing consciousness of a high duty triumphantly done which is what makes hangmen and husbands happy.

This sentiment is fairly consistent with Mencken’s distaste for common notions and the philosophical outlook he unabashedly set down throughout his life as a writer (drawing on Friedrich Nietzsche and Herbert Spencer, among others).[48]

Mencken wrote as follows about the difficulties of good men reaching national office when such campaigns must necessarily be conducted remotely:

The larger the mob, the harder the test. In small areas, before small electorates, a first-rate man occasionally fights his way through, carrying even the mob with him by force of his personality. But when the field is nationwide, and the fight must be waged chiefly at second and third hand, and the force of personality cannot so readily make itself felt, then all the odds are on the man who is, intrinsically, the most devious and mediocre—the man who can most easily adeptly disperse the notion that his mind is a virtual vacuum.
The Presidency tends, year by year, to go to such men. As democracy is perfected, the office represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. We move toward a lofty ideal. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart’s desire at last, and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.[49]

Science and mathematics[edit]

Mencken defended the evolutionary views of Charles Darwin but spoke unfavorably of many prominent physicists and had little regard for pure mathematics. Regarding theoretical physics, he said to longtime editor Charles Angoff, “Imagine measuring infinity! That’s a laugh.”[50]

In response, Angoff said: “Well, without mathematics there wouldn’t be any engineering, no chemistry, no physics.” Mencken responded: “That’s true, but it’s reasonable mathematics. Addition, subtraction, multiplication, fractions, division, that’s what real mathematics is. The rest is baloney. Astrology. Religion. All of our sciences still suffer from their former attachment to religion, and that is why there is so much metaphysics and astrology, the two are the same, in science.”[50]

Elsewhere, he dismissed higher mathematics and probability theory as “nonsense”, after he read Angoff’s article for Charles S. Peirce in the American Mercury: “So you believe in that garbage, too—theories of knowledge, infinity, laws of probability. I can make no sense of it, and I don’t believe you can either, and I don’t think your god Peirce knew what he was talking about.”[51]

Mencken repeated these opinions in articles for the American Mercury. He said mathematics is a fiction, compared with individual facts that make up science. In a review for Hans Vaihinger‘s The Philosophy of “As If”, he said:

The human mind, at its present stage of development, cannot function without the aid of fictions, but neither can it function without the aid of facts—save, perhaps, when it is housed in the skull of a university professor of philosophy. Of the two, the facts are enormously the more important. In certain metaphysical fields, e.g. those of mathematics, law, theology, osteopathy and ethics—the fiction will probably hold out for many years, but elsewhere the fact slowly ousts it, and that ousting is what is called intellectual progress. Very few fictions remain in use in anatomy, or in plumbing and gas-fitting; they have even begun to disappear from economics.[52]

Mencken repeatedly identified mathematics with metaphysics and theology. According to Mencken, mathematics is necessarily infected with metaphysics. Mathematicians tend to engage in metaphysical speculation. In a review of Alfred North Whitehead‘s The Aims of Education, Mencken remarked that, although he agreed with Whitehead’s thesis and admired his writing style, “Now and then he falls into mathematical jargon and pollutes his discourse with equations”, and “[T]here are moments when he seems to be following some of his mathematical colleagues into the gaudy metaphysics which now entertains them”.[53] For Mencken, theology was characterized by the fact that it uses correct reasoning from false premises. Mencken uses the term “theology” more generally to refer to the use of logic in science or any field of knowledge. In a review of Arthur Eddington‘s The Nature of the Physical World and Joseph Needham‘s Man a Machine, Mencken ridiculed the use of reasoning to establish any fact in science. Theologians happen to be masters of “logic” and yet are mental defectives:

Is there anything in the general thinking of theologians which makes their opinion on the point of any interest or value? What have they ever done in other fields to match the fact-finding of the biologists? I can find nothing in the record. Their processes of thought, taking one day with another, are so defective as to be preposterous. True enough, they are masters of logic, but they always start out from palpably false premises.[54]

Mencken wrote a review of Sir James Jeans‘s book, The Mysterious Universe, in which Mencken wrote that mathematics is not necessary for physics. Instead of mathematical “speculation” (such as quantum theory), Mencken believed physicists should directly look at individual facts in the laboratory, as do chemists:

If chemists were similarly given to fanciful and mystical guessing, they would have hatched a quantum theory forty years ago to account for the variations that they observed in atomic weights. But they kept on plugging away in their laboratories without calling in either mathematicians or theologians to aid them, and eventually they discovered the isotopes, and what had been chaos was reduced to the most exact sort of order.[55]

In the same article, which he re-printed in the Mencken Chrestomathy, Mencken primarily contrasts what real scientists do, which is to simply directly look at the existence of “shapes and forces” confronting them instead of (such as in statistics) attempting to speculate and use mathematical models. Physicists and especially astronomers are consequently not real scientists, because when looking at shapes or forces, they do not simply “patiently wait for further light”, but resort to mathematical theory. There is no need for statistics in scientific physics, since one should simply look at the facts while statistics attempts to construct mathematical models. On the other hand, the really competent physicists do not bother with the “theology” or reasoning of mathematical theories (such as in quantum mechanics):

[Physicists] have, in late years, made a great deal of progress, though it has been accompanied by a considerable quackery. Some of the notions which they now try to foist upon the world, especially in the astronomical realm and about the atom, are obviously nonsensical, and will soon go the way of all unsupported speculations. But there is nothing intrinsically insoluble about the problems they mainly struggle with, and soon or late really competent physicists will arise to solve them. These really competent physicists, I predict, will be too busy in their laboratories to give any time to either metaphysics or theology. Both are eternal enemies of every variety of sound thinking, and no man can traffic with them without losing something of his good judgment.[55]

Mencken ridiculed Albert Einstein‘s theory of general relativity, believing that “in the long run his curved space may be classed with the psychosomatic bumps of [Franz Josef] Gall and [Johann] Spurzheim“.[56] In his private letters, he said:

It is a well known fact that physicists are greatly given to the supernatural. Why this should be I don’t know, but the fact is plain. One of the most absurd of all spiritualists is Sir Oliver Lodge. I have the suspicion that the cause may be that physics itself, as currently practised, is largely moonshine. Certainly there is a great deal of highly dubious stuff in the work of such men as Eddington.[57]



Mencken’s home at 1524 Hollins Street in Baltimore‘s Union Square neighborhood, where he lived for 67 years, was bequeathed to the University of Maryland, Baltimore on the death of his younger brother, August, in 1967. The City of Baltimore acquired the property in 1983, and the H. L. Mencken House became part of the City Life Museums. It has been closed to general admission since 1997, but is opened for special events and group visits by arrangement.


Shortly after World War II, Mencken expressed his intention of bequeathing his books and papers to Baltimore’s Enoch Pratt Free Library. At his death, it was in possession of most of the present large collection. As a result, his papers as well as much of his personal library, which includes many books inscribed by major authors, are held in the Library’s Central Branch on Cathedral Street in Baltimore. The original third floor H. L. Mencken Room and Collection housing this collection was dedicated on April 17, 1956. The new Mencken Room, on the first floor of the Library’s Annex, was opened in November 2003.

The collection contains Mencken’s typescripts, newspaper and magazine contributions, published books, family documents and memorabilia, clipping books, large collection of presentation volumes, file of correspondence with prominent Marylanders, and the extensive material he collected while he was preparing The American Language.

Other Mencken related collections of note are at Dartmouth College, Harvard University, Princeton University, Johns Hopkins University, and Yale University. In 2007, Johns Hopkins acquired “nearly 6,000 books, photographs and letters by and about Mencken” from “the estate of an Ohio accountant”.[58]

The Sara Haardt Mencken collection at Goucher College includes letters exchanged between Haardt and Mencken and condolences written after her death. Some of Mencken’s vast literary correspondence is held at the New York Public Library. “Gift of HL Mencken 1929” is stamped on The Marriage of Heaven and Hell, Luce 1906 edition of William Blake, which shows up from the Library of Congress online version for reading. Mencken’s letters to Louise (Lou) Wylie, a reporter and feature writer for New Orleans’s The Times-Picayune newspaper, are archived at Loyola University New Orleans.[59]


  • George Bernard Shaw: His Plays (1905)
  • The Philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche (1907)
  • The Gist of Nietzsche (1910)
  • What You Ought to Know about your Baby (Ghostwriter for Leonard K. Hirshberg; 1910)
  • Men versus the Man: a Correspondence between Robert Rives La Monte, Socialist and H. L. Mencken, Individualist (1910)
  • Europe After 8:15 (1914)
  • A Book of Burlesques (1916)
  • A Little Book in C Major (1916)
  • A Book of Prefaces (1917)
  • In Defense of Women (1918)
  • Damn! A Book of Calumny (1918)
  • The American Language (1919)
  • Prejudices (1919–27)
    • First Series (1919)
    • Second Series (1920)
    • Third Series (1922)
    • Fourth Series (1924)
    • Fifth Series (1926)
    • Sixth Series (1927)
    • Selected Prejudices (1927)
  • Heliogabalus (A Buffoonery in Three Acts) (1920)
  • The American Credo (1920)
  • Notes on Democracy (1926)
  • Menckeneana: A Schimpflexikon (1928) – Editor
  • Treatise on the Gods (1930)
  • Making a President (1932)
  • Treatise on Right and Wrong (1934)
  • Happy Days, 1880–1892 (1940)
  • Newspaper Days, 1899–1906 (1941)[60]
  • A New Dictionary of Quotations on Historical Principles from Ancient and Modern Sources (1942)
  • Heathen Days, 1890–1936 (1943)
  • Christmas Story (1944)
  • The American Language, Supplement I (1945)
  • The American Language, Supplement II (1948)
  • A Mencken Chrestomathy (1949) (edited by H.L. Mencken)

Posthumous collections

  • Minority Report (1956)
  • On Politics: A Carnival of Buncombe (1956)
  • Cairns, Huntington, ed. (1965), The American Scene.
  • The Bathtub Hoax and Other Blasts and Bravos from the Chicago Tribune (1958)
  • Lippman, Theo Jr, ed. (1975), A Gang of Pecksniffs: And Other Comments on Newspaper Publishers, Editors and Reporters.
  • Rodgers, Marion Elizabeth, ed. (1991), The Impossible H.L. Mencken: A Selection of His Best Newspaper Stories.
  • Yardley, Jonathan, ed. (1992), My Life As Author and Editor.
  • A Second Mencken Chrestomathy (1994) (edited by Terry Teachout)
  • Thirty-five Years of Newspaper Work (1996)
  • A Religious Orgy in Tennessee: A Reporter’s Account of the Scopes Monkey Trial, Melville House Publishing, 2006.

Chapbooks, pamphlets, and notable essays[edit]

See also[edit]



  1. ^ “Obituary”, Variety, February 1, 1956
  2. ^ a b Mencken, Henry (1926). “Notes on Democracy”. New York: Alfred Knopf.
  3. ^ a b “Mencken Was Pro-Nazi, His Diary Shows”. Los Angeles Times. Associated Press. December 5, 1989. Archived from the original on November 10, 2012. Retrieved November 23, 2015.
  4. ^ a b Gibson, Larry S. (Winter 2014). “H.L. Mencken: Racist or Civil Rights Champion?”. Menckeniana. 208 (208): 1–12. JSTOR 26485502. If one were to label Mencken’s way of looking at mankind, one could rightly call it “elitism”. It was not “racism”.
  5. ^ Siegel, Fred. The Revolt Against the Masses. New York City: Encounter Books. p. 25.
  6. ^ “H. L. Mencken Room – Enoch Pratt Free Library”. Retrieved April 13, 2018.
  7. ^ Sowell, Thomas (1996), Migrations and Cultures: A World View, New York: Basic Books, p. 82, ISBN 978-0465045891, … it may be indicative of how long German cultural ties endured [in the United States] that the German language was spoken in childhood by such disparate twentieth-century American figures as famed writer H. L. Mencken, baseball stars Babe Ruth and Lou Gehrig, and by the Nobel Prize-winning economist George Stigler.
  8. ^ Detailed description, Baltimore: Mencken’s home, archived from the original on October 27, 2005
  9. ^ Happy Days, p. vii
  10. ^ St. Petersburg Times – September 23, 1987
  11. ^ Newspaper Days, 1899–1906, p. 58.
  12. ^ Sara Haardt (short biographical sketch), AL
  13. ^ Alabama rejected the Nineteenth Amendment on September 22, 1919, though it later ratified it as a symbolic gesture on September 8, 1953.
  14. ^ Mencken (bio), Mencken house, archived from the original on February 4, 2012, retrieved June 17, 2012
  15. ^ “Literary Figures: Sally Haardt”, The Real South: Famous People, AL
  16. ^ Filkins, Dexter (August 14, 2001), “Ailing Churchill Biographer Says He Can’t Finish Trilogy”, The New York Times, retrieved July 24, 2014}.
  17. ^ “HL Mencken, 75, Dies in Baltimore”. The New York Times. January 30, 1956. Retrieved June 15, 2008. HL Mencken was found dead in bed early today. The 75-year-old author, editor, critic and newspaper man had lived in retirement since suffering a cerebral hemorrhage in 1948
  18. ^ Baltimore Sun
  19. ^ “Epitaph”, Smart Set, December 3, 1921, p. 33.
  20. ^ “Mencken: The American Iconoclast” By Marion Elizabeth Rodgers. Page 549
  21. ^ Harrison, SL (2005), AKA HL Mencken: Selected Pseudonymous Writings, Wolf Den Books
  22. ^ Mencken, HL (October 1924), “Philosophers as Liars”, The American Mercury, III (10): 253–255
  23. ^ Rand, Ayn (1995), Berliner, Michael (ed.), Letters, Dutton, pp. 10 (Mencken’s opinion of the novel), 13–14 (Rand’s praise of Mencken)
  24. ^ Jackson, William J.; Thuesen, Peter Johannes (2014). American Tricksters. Cascade Books. p. 219. ISBN 9781625647900.
  25. ^ “Mencken”, Los Angeles Times, January 14, 1990
  26. ^ “Moyers”, Commentary, PBS
  27. ^ O’Rourke, PJ (December 7, 2014). “HL Mencken’s days trilogy, expanded edition”. The New York Times. New York City.
  28. ^ a b Fitzpatrick, Vincent (2004). H.L. Mencken. Mercer University Press. p. 37.
  29. ^ Gurstein, Rochelle (2016). The Repeal of Reticence: America’s Cultural and Legal Struggles Over Free Speech, Obscenity, Sexual Liberation, and Modern Art. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. p. 131.
  30. ^ Mencken, H. L. (1975). A gang of pecksniffs: And other comments on newspaper publishers, editors and reporters. Westport, Connecticut: Arlington House Publishers. ISBN 978-0870003202.
  31. ^ Keating, Joseph jr, PhD (July 16, 1993), “Because We Know Chiropractic Works …”, Dynamic Chiropractic (sarcastic article), Chiro Web, 11 (15)
  32. ^ Mencken, HL (2006), Prejudices: A Selection, Johns Hopkins University Press, ISBN 9780801885358
  33. ^ Whorton, James C (2004), Nature Cures: The History of Alternative Medicine in America, US: Oxford University Press, ISBN 9780195171624
  34. ^ HL Mencken Arrested in Boston, Mass Moments
  35. ^ Sutton, Matthew Avery (2007), Aimee Semple McPherson and the Resurrection of Christian America, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, pp. 119–120
  36. ^ Mencken, HL (1930), The American Mercury
  37. ^ Manchester, p. 252
  38. ^ Mencken, HL (2012). Fecher, Charles A (ed.). Diary. New York City: Knopf Doubleday. p. 28. ISBN 9780307808868.
  39. ^ La Monte, Robert Rives; Mencken, HL (2013) [1910]. Men versus the Man: A Correspondence between Robert Rives La Monte, Socialist, and H. L. Mencken, Individualist. Nashville, Tennessee: The Classics.US. p. 116. ISBN 978-1230346687.
  40. ^ Hitchens, Christopher (November 17, 2002). “A Smart Set of One”. The New York Times. Retrieved July 12, 2019.
  41. ^ Mencken, HL (July 1923). “The Anglo-Saxon”. Baltimore Evening Sun.
  42. ^ Mencken, HL (1930). Treatise on the Gods. New York City: Knopf Doubleday. pp. 345–146.
  43. ^ Hobson, Fred C. Mencken: A Life. (1995), p. 477
  44. ^ Nietzsche, Friedrich (1999). The Anti-Christ. Tucson, Arizona: See Sharp Press. ISBN 1-884365-20-5. Note: URL goes to Gutenberg version of just Mencken’s text, but does not include Chaz Bufe’s introduction or slight changes.
  45. ^ a b Vidal, Gore; Mencken, HL (1991). “Foreword”. In Rodgers, Marion Elizabeth (ed.). The Impossible H.L. Mencken. New York City: Knopf Doubleday. p. xxxi. ISBN 978-0385262071.
  46. ^ “Last Words by H. L. Mencken”.
  47. ^ Mencken, H. L. (July 26, 1920). “Bayard vs. Lionheart”. Baltimore Evening Sun.
  48. ^ a b Angoff, Charles. H. L. Mencken: A Portrait from Memory. A. S. Barnes (New York, 1961), p. 141
  49. ^ Angoff, Charles. H. L. Mencken: A Portrait from Memory. A. S. Barnes (New York, 1961), p. 194
  50. ^ Mencken, HL (October 1924). “Philosophers as Liars”. The American Mercury. III (10): 253–255.
  51. ^ Mencken, HL (June 1929). “What Is It All About?”. The American Mercury. XVII (66): 251–252.
  52. ^ Mencken, HL (April 1929). “The Riddle of the Universe”. The American Mercury. XVI (64): 509–510.
  53. ^ a b Mencken, HL (February 1931). “The Eternal Conundrum”. The American Mercury. XXII (86): 252–254.
  54. ^ Mencken, HL. Minority Report, H. L. Mencken’s Notebooks. Alfred A. Knopf (New York, 1956), pp. 273–274
  55. ^ Mencken, Henry Louis. Letters of H. L. Mencken. Alfred A. Knopf (New York, 1961), p. 322
  56. ^ Staff (2009). “Books Mencken Collection”. Associated Press. Archived from the original on September 10, 2016. Retrieved July 8, 2016.
  57. ^ “H. L. Mencken Letters Finding Aid” (PDF). Special Collections & Archives, J. Edgar & Louise S. Monroe Library, Loyola University New Orleans. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 6, 2015. Retrieved July 17, 2018.
  58. ^ “Jonathan Yardley’s Second Reading: H. L. Mencken’s ‘Newspaper Days’. The Washington Post. July 3, 2009.
  59. ^ “The Penalty of Death by H.L. Mencken | Major English | Class 12 – Mero Notice”. Retrieved April 6, 2021.


External links[edit]


Bathtub hoax


Beringer's Lying Stones

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Check Also

Literary forgery